Current:Home > NewsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -TradeStation
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Ethermac Exchange View
Date:2025-04-07 16:57:19
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (8182)
Related
- The Louvre will be renovated and the 'Mona Lisa' will have her own room
- DJT stock is on a winning streak. But is Trump Media a risky investment?
- Feeling stressed about the election? Here’s what some are doing and what they say you can do too
- Beyoncé Channels Marilyn Monroe in Bombshell Look at Glamour's Women of the Year Ceremony
- The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
- Jason Kelce Playfully Teases Travis Kelce Over Taylor Swift’s Return to NFL Game
- EBUEY: Balancing Risks and Returns in Cryptocurrency Investment
- Why Sharna Burgess Was “Hurt” by Julianne Hough’s Comments on Her DWTS Win
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- Kenya Moore, Madison LeCroy, & Kandi Burruss Swear by This $5.94 Hair Growth Hack—Get It on Sale Now!
Ranking
- The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
- Sarah Michelle Gellar Addresses Returning to I Know What You Did Last Summer Reboot
- In Florida Senate Race, Two Candidates With Vastly Different Views on the Climate
- Will Hurricane Milton hit Mar-a-Lago? What we know about storm's path and Trump's estate
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- Judge tosses a New York law that moved many local elections to even-numbered years
- Mega Millions winning numbers for October 8 drawing: Jackpot rises to $129 million
- Ethel Kennedy, widow of Robert F. Kennedy, suffers stroke
Recommendation
Meet the volunteers risking their lives to deliver Christmas gifts to children in Haiti
Mila Kunis Shares Secret to Relationship With Husband Ashton Kutcher
Geomagnetic storm could hinder radios, satellites as Hurricane Milton makes landfall
Mississippi’s Medicaid director is leaving for a private-sector job
Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
Travis Kelce’s Brother Jason Reveals One of the “Greatest Things” About Taylor Swift Romance
As schools ban mobile phones, parents seek a 'safe' option for kids
Vermont college chapel renamed over eugenics link can keep new title, judge says